I recently read this post from Aave about liquid glass UI for the web, and it’s a really nice example of where interface design seems to be heading.
Not just flat buttons, cards, and panels, but UI that feels a bit more physical. The kind of interface where a toggle or slider doesn’t just move from one state to another, but feels like it has some depth, reflection, and weight to it.
Glassmorphism has been around for a while, so this is not totally new. We’ve all seen the frosted cards, blurry backgrounds, and transparent panels. Some of it looks great, some of it looks very 2021. But this feels a bit more interesting because it’s not just a blurred layer sitting on top of a page.
The glass actually bends what’s behind it.
That small detail changes the whole feeling. A tiny switch can feel more tactile when the handle moves like a small lens. A slider can feel nicer when the thumb refracts the track underneath it. A toggle group can make the selected state feel like it’s gliding into place instead of just switching on and off.
There are some fun examples where this really makes sense. Video controls can sit on top of moving footage without feeling completely separate from it. A QR code can react when you tap it. Even a simple toolbar or navigation pill can feel a little more polished when the selected item has some depth to it.
The tricky part, of course, is the web. Something can look amazing in one browser and completely fall apart in another. That’s usually where these kinds of visual experiments stay as experiments. They look great in a demo, but they’re hard to turn into real product UI.
What I liked about the article is that it treats liquid glass as an actual web design problem, not just a shiny visual trend. Text still needs to be readable. Buttons still need to be clickable. The effect needs to work with real content, not just a carefully prepared mockup. And it has to feel fast, otherwise the whole thing becomes annoying very quickly.
I don’t think every website needs liquid glass everywhere. Actually, please don’t put it everywhere.
But used in the right places, it could make interfaces feel more alive. A selected state, a media control, a small switch, or a floating action button can feel more considered with just a bit of depth and refraction. It’s one of those details users might not consciously notice, but they can still feel the difference.
For designers, I think the main takeaway is that visual trends are only useful when they improve the interaction. A beautiful screenshot is nice, but the real question is how it feels when someone actually uses it.
For developers, it’s a fun reminder that the web still has a lot of room for experimentation. SVG filters, canvas, and WebGL can do some pretty cool things when they’re used thoughtfully. The hard part is making the effect reusable, fast, and reliable enough to ship.
I like this direction because it brings a little bit of materiality back to digital products. Not in a heavy skeuomorphic way, but in a more subtle, modern way.
More depth, more motion, and more attention to how things feel, not just how they look.
Did you find this article useful?
Buy me a coffee.
Do you have a web development problem you cannot seem to be able to solve?
Send me an email or reach out to me on Twitter.